Back to top

E. (1985)patibility when you look at the mother-newborn matchmaking: Sources and operations

raummedical 2024년 3월 23일 0 comments

E. (1985)patibility when you look at the mother-newborn matchmaking: Sources and operations

Lamb, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible dating (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Imagined resemblance and you can matchmaking achievement certainly one of dating partners: An idiographic strategy

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If I’m not sizzling hot, could you be very hot or otherwise not?: Physical-appeal critiques and you will relationship tastes given that a function of a person’s very own attractiveness. Emotional Technology, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in marriage and other close relationships. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of aspiration. In the J. McV. Search (Ed.), Personality together with choices disorders (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Force. [ Hyperlinks ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationship dating fate having insiders’ and you can outsiders’ position: Who and you may what exactly is questioned things. Individual Dating, 13, 349-362. [ Links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you can relationship high quality within the newlyweds: Several depending means. Log out of Identity and you will Social Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]

Madden, M., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Online dating. Arizona, DC: Declaration for the Pew Internet sites & Western Existence Endeavor. Recovered , out-of [ webbsida Backlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the precision out of forecasts regarding the matchmaking matchmaking: Exactly how and just why carry out lovers’ forecasts range from those individuals made by observers? Identification and you may Public Therapy Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing products on initiation regarding heterosexual relationships. Papers exhibited at the Basic Internationally Fulfilling towards the Private Relationships, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]

Merkle, Elizabeth.Roentgen., & Richardson, R.An effective. (2000). Digital matchmaking and you will virtual appropriate: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Relatives, 49, 187-192. [ Links ]

Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was genuine similarity important for appeal? A meta-study of genuine and you can seen similarity. Log of Personal and private Matchmaking, 25, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]

Morry, Yards. Yards. (2005). Matchmaking fulfillment while the a beneficial predictor off similarity ratings; An examination of your own destination-resemblance theory. Record out-of Public and private Dating, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Website links ]

Diary of Social and personal Relationships, 23, 865-880

Morry, Yards. M. (2007). The fresh interest-similarity theory among cross-sex loved ones: Dating fulfillment, understood similarities, and you can self-providing attitudes. Log from Social and private Relationship, 24, 117-138. [ Backlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you can expansion of SVR principle of dyadic pairing. Log regarding ily, 44, 929-947. [ Links ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will separation and divorce: Good 14-year longitudinal examination of black colored partners and you may light couples. Diary out-of Personal and personal Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]

Orenstein, S. (). The love formula Suits believes this has receive a formula to have governing the net matchmaking providers: A scientific strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Right. Organization dos.0 Mag. Retrieved for the out of [ Backlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Character similarities into the lovers. Character and you may Individual Differences, 45, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Companion preferences: Exactly what functions manage men desire inside their brief-title sexual and you will much time-label romantic partners? Log off Therapy and you may Human Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The new role of one’s worry about regarding the initiation and span of societal interaction. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationship (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]