Whereas, even though that it Replacement of Trustee hasn’t been filed prior to the first date out-of guide as required by T.C.An excellent. 35-5-101, mais aussi. seq., then undersigned owner of the indebtedness really does hereby claim that it did appoint the fresh Alternative Trustee prior to the very first notice off book and you can do hereby ratify and show all actions pulled because of the Replacement Trustee after said date from substitution but prior to the recording with the substitution
(Id.) When this language, as required under T.C.A. 35-5-114, is present, the recording of Substitution of Trustee is of no consequence, as long as it was recorded prior to the deed evidencing sale[.] Goodson, 2016 WL 3752217, at *8 n.15 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). Because the foreclosure sale has not occurred and no foreclosure deed has been executed, the Substitution of Trustee was timely recorded on . (Ex. 2.)
Further, Plaintiff cannot plausibly argue that the Deed of Trust requires the recordation of the Substitute Trustee prior the first publication and mailing of the Notice of Foreclosure Sale. This Court, when interpreting the same terms under a similar deed of trust, held that the Deed of Trust contains no requirement as to when the instrument must be recorded[.] Id. at *5. 6
Thus, Plaintiff fails to state a claim that the fresh new property foreclosure is actually unlawful by reason out of recording the brand new Alternative Trustee after the earliest guide and you will emailing of your own See regarding Property foreclosure Sales.
- Replacing out-of Trustee. Bank, within the alternative, loans Athens could possibly get sporadically cure Trustee and you may appoint a replacement trustee to any Trustee designated hereunder from the a device submitted within the the fresh new state where that it Coverage Device is recorded. Rather than conveyance of the home, the fresh new successor trustee shall succeed to all or any name, electricity and you may responsibilities conferred on Trustee herein and by Relevant Law.
The newest Action Of Trust Doesn’t need An alerts Out-of Acceleration To help you Alert Plaintiff Away from Their own To Reinstate The borrowed funds.
Plaintiff cannot claim that the Notice of Acceleration is deficient under paragraph 22 of the Deed of Trust. Paragraphs 15 & 22 concern how notice is generally provided for under the Agreement and Defendants issuing a notice of default prior to acceleration. Sandlin v. Citibank,
N.Good., 2018 WL 2370769, at *3 (W.D. Tenn. 2018) (emphasis added); see Financial of brand new York Mellon v. Chamberlain, 2020 WL 563527, at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020) (assessing whether the notice of default prior to acceleration as required by paragraph 22 of the deed of trust); CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Drake, 410 S.W.3d 797, 810 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013) (evaluating whether the notice of default was sufficient under paragraph 22 of the deed of trust). Here, paragraph 22 of the Deed of Trust requires a notice prior to acceleration (i.e. a notice of default; not a notice of acceleration) to notify Plaintiff of her right to reinstate the loan. (Ex. 1, Sec. 22.) Therefore, Plaintiff fails to state a wrongful foreclosure claim based upon an allegation that the Notice of Acceleration is required to notify her of the right to reinstate the loan prior to acceleration. Further, Plaintiff makes no claim that any other document (including a notice of default) failed to satisfy the provisions of the Deed of Trust by providing her the notice at issue.
BAC Lenders Upkeep v
Plaintiff cannot claim that the notices of default and of foreclosure sale were deficient because they were not delivered to the Plaintiff. Neither paragraph 15 of the Deed of Trust nor Tennessee law requires actual notice (i.e. delivery). Smith v. Hughes, 2021 WL 1779410, at *7